Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
The Post - Athens, OH
The Post

Abby Waechter

Absolutely Abby: Trump’s cabinet overprioritizes loyalty

The appointment of cabinet members plays a significant role in shaping national and global policies. For President-elect Donald Trump, however, one of the most frequently cited factors in selecting his team is loyalty. According to The Wall Street Journal’s Andrew Restuccia, the Trump administration emphasizes ensuring appointees align with the president’s worldview, noting “the unifying characteristic is that (appointees) are loyal to President Trump.”

This narrow focus on loyalty stifles diversity of thought in the administration, potentially hindering its ability to tackle complex issues. By surrounding himself with allies who share his vision, Trump risks limiting the diversity of expertise and perspectives needed for effective policymaking.

The cabinet appointment process involves selecting individuals to lead the major executive departments of the federal government and advise the president on key issues. After the president-elect nominates candidates, they must undergo a thorough vetting process that includes background checks, financial disclosures and U.S. Senate confirmation hearings. During these hearings, senators question nominees' qualifications, experience and suitability for the role. Although the president has the authority to make these appointments, the Senate must approve most nominations with a simple majority vote.

One prominent figure in Trump’s cabinet is Susie Wiles, a longtime Florida political operative and co-manager of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. Wiles is known for her behind-the-scenes influence and steady presence, qualities that make her a strong candidate for Chief of Staff. Trump, who can be unpredictable in his leadership style, could benefit from Wiles’ organizational skills and ability to manage internal dynamics.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, a vocal and staunch Trump ally, is being considered for Attorney General. Despite his legal background, Gaetz’s ongoing legal troubles — including an investigation into sex trafficking — could complicate his confirmation. His combative, polarizing political style further raises questions about his ability to build the broad bipartisan support needed to lead the Department of Justice effectively. Although loyalty to Trump might help Gaetz secure a nomination, it may limit his ability to govern impartially and work collaboratively across party lines.

An unexpected nominee is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmental activist and anti-vaccine advocate, to be Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services secretary. Kennedy’s focus on government transparency and his criticism of “corruption” align with Trump’s anti-establishment rhetoric. However, his controversial anti-vaccine views could make his nomination highly contentious, especially among public health experts.

Pete Hegseth, a former Army officer and conservative media personality, has emerged as a possible nominee for Defense Secretary. Known for his energetic criticism of the Pentagon’s leadership, Hegseth advocates for military reforms aimed at reducing bureaucracy and eliminating “woke” policies. Although his military experience is notable, his media presence might raise concerns about his ability to manage the Pentagon’s complexities. His polarizing views could face resistance from Democrats and some Republicans in the Senate, making his confirmation uncertain.

Although there are many more cabinet positions to fill, loyalty will remain a defining characteristic throughout. From the selection of key advisors to lesser-known positions, the emphasis on loyalty over diverse expertise is likely to shape not only the composition of the cabinet but also the administration's overall approach to governance.

Although loyalty might ensure a cohesive team with shared priorities, it raises concerns about governance. Prioritizing loyalty over expertise could lead to a cabinet that lacks the diverse perspectives needed to address the country’s challenges. 

A team of “yes men” may push policies through, but it could also limit adaptability and hinder effective policymaking.

Abby Waechter is a junior studying strategic communications at Ohio University. Please note that the views and opinions of the columnists do not reflect those of The Post. Have something to say? Email her at aw087421@ohio.edu or tweet her @AbbyWaechter.


Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2016-2024 The Post, Athens OH